| Overview
Building Code
Accessibility Code
Hazardous Material
Fire Investigations
Interpretations
Newsletters & FAQ's
Healthcare
Seminars |
Issue No. 10
State Fire Marshal’s Office Previews New Fire Code:
The State Fire Prevention Code (527 CMR) is about to undergo a transformation.
A new code is under development based on the (yet-to-be-released) 2003
edition of NFPA-1. Because previous versions of NFPA-1 have referenced
The Life Safety Code (NFPA-101) extensively, and because NFPA-101 contains
requirements similar to building codes (egress, fire protection systems,
etc.), there is a possibility of future conflicting requirements in the
State Building Code and State Fire Prevention Code. Please join us for
the September Codes Committee meeting on Wednesday September 18 at 8:30
in the 5th floor conference room of the BSA building (52 Broad Street)
for a discussion with guest speaker Timothee Rodrique, Division Director
of the Office of the State Fire Marshal, regarding the future of the State
Fire Code.
New Codes in Nearby States: New Hampshire
In our June Newsletter we reported that the first New Hampshire statewide
building code would become effective in September 2003 and would incorporate
the height and area limitations of BOCA-99 into the framework of the International
Building Code. Apparently the situation is even more complex than this.
Our friend Jerry Tepe who is on the New Hampshire State Building Code
Review Board writes as follows:
“September 14, 2002 was thought to be the effective date of the
new statewide building code in New Hampshire. The legislation’s
sponsor, Representative Robert Clegg (R-Hudson), has made it clear this
was the legislative intent. However several state agencies, most notably
the Fire Marshall and PUC, have gotten legal opinions that the effective
date is September 14, 2003. As of the September 10 meeting of the State
Building Code Review Board, the issue is not resolved. In an opposite
move, the NH Building Officials Association has advised its members to
follow the 2002 effective date. Best advice at this point is to check
early in a project with your local building official. If you need review
by either the Fire Marshall or the PUC, you will probably need to comply
with the current Fire Code and PUC regulations, including specifically
the BOCA 1999 Height & Area Table, but can request variances as always.”
NFPA 5000 Building Code Previewed:
Just as the International Code Council (ICC) was ready to announce a spectacular
accomplishment in September of 1999, the publication of a single family
of coordinated codes for the nation, the National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) upset the apple-cart by announcing the publication of their own
building code, to be entitled NFPA 5000. NFPA publishes standards, a Life
Safety Code, and an Electrical Code, but this is the first time that the
internationally respected fire-safety organization has entered the building
code arena. This development was particularly upsetting to the AIA which
had fought hard to produce a single model code. Efforts to negotiate between
the NFPA and the ICC have yet to suggest any likelihood of compromise,
and in the remarkably short period of two years NFPA 5000 has become a
reality. While remaining opposed to the publication of a separate building
code, the AIA has participated in the development of NFPA 5000 and is
monitoring its publication with great interest. In early September seven
architects from across the country with backgrounds in code writing, consulting,
and enforcement convened for two days in Cincinnati to review and evaluate
the new NFPA code. The group identified both strengths and weaknesses
of NFPA 5000 and passed along the results of their evaluation to the AIA
Codes and Standards Committee.
The publication of NFPA 5000 appears to be a fatal blow to the AIA’s
goal of a single building code in the U.S.A., however Dave Collins FAIA
who chaired the technical review in Cincinnati reminded those present
that, based on the experience of the consolidation of the three model
code groups, nothing can be ruled out. One of the great variables in future
developments will be the role of the AIA. If AIA encourages its members
to actively oppose the adoption of NFPA 5000 the new code could face a
long uphill battle, and terms for consolidation with the International
Building Code could eventually be reached. However, if NFPA uses its enormous
capital and political resources effectively while other interests watch
from the sidelines the continued existence of two competing building codes
seems guaranteed.
Having invested years in the cause of creating a single building code,
what should the AIA do now? To voice your opinion, or for a copy of the
Technical Committee report, contact BSA Codes Committee Chair Vernon Woodworth
at avw@rwsullivan.com.
|